Introduction
Question 10:
The Third Version of my dismissal
In April
2017, Mr. Mauro Meggiolaro, as "Critical Shareholder" of Eni
(shareholder Fondazione Finanza Etica - Gruppo Banca Etica) took my case to
the Eni Shareholders’ Meeting.
Under
Italian law, Mr. Meggiolaro wrote 10 (ten) questions about my history (Doc. 43-A). These questions would have to be
answered by the Board of Eni. However, the members of the Board of Directors of
the company did not answer to the questions that were individually formulated
to them and preferred to respond in a long text (Doc. 43-B). In this text, Eni wrote a "new
version" (The Third Version) about my dismissal.
"The
former employee was fired together with other actors of unlawful behavior, by
reticence, for having violated the obligation of confidentiality and by trying
to use instrumentally Eni's Code of Ethics to gain personal advantages of the
company".
This was
the THIRD VERSION of my dismissal without Eni having submitted
one single proof on its charges.
In fact,
Eni tried to prove what the company said. In this same document Eni also
says:
“Contrary
to his belief, from the investigations performed by Eni, following the notices
received in 2002, it emerged that, as reported by the Board of Statutory
Auditors of Eni SpA in the Shareholders’ Meeting Report included in the Eni
2002 Financial Statements”.
But, this “Eni
2002 Financial Statements” has 354 pages and there is no mention of my case
(Doc. 43-C).
Questions
10:
10-A) Eni
presented the “third version” about my dismissal. The company tried to prove
its claim by citing “Eni 2002 Financial Statements”. This document is no longer
available on the company’s website. I found it doing a Google search. In the
354 pages of this official document there is no mention about my case! Why does
Eni claims something about me that is not the truth?
10-B) What
is the company’s intention to quote an official document to try to make prove,
knowing that there is no mention about my case? Doesn’t this attitude
demonstrates Eni’s “bad faith” regarding my case, and the only intention is to
denigrate and discredit me?
There will
be a total of "15 questions" which, in these 17 years, Eni has not
yet answered.
Follow
daily the new questions in my timeline to see if the Italian oil giant will
answer.
Question 10
is also in my LinkedIN.
No comments:
Post a Comment